Shangri-La without terrorism and slavery, we plege

Background: Recently, there are many anti-protest pageants in major cities, and also many discussion and debate sessions were hold in some Universities. Some friends felt very bad because they fail to persuade their friends. Even more persons asked for help on Internet. Therefore, hope this guidance can help you.

Core Problem: For China, the core of Tibet problem is the contest of the power and benefit, the deployment of global stratagem and the stabilization of society. The essential reason that the Western countries blame China is that the relative high-speed development of China continuously restricted and limited their power, benefit and influent for globe.  That is the core of the confliction is benefit, and the surface of it is the confliction of ideology (reference: the analysis of the antinomy of democracy and efficiency by Madison, one of the founder of U.S.A).

However, this post-jungle rule is a hidden rule, which is not suitable for publication. Please do not use this as your argumentation. The western people who understand this will either keep silence or keep their position whatever and talk about human rights and humanism.

Purpose:  After understand the core problem, it should be realized that the purpose of propaganda is to persuade the people around us who has been beclouded by their government through the announcement of human rights and humanism. Then, make a more comfortable atmosphere around us and influent the consensus of the society in some degree.

At first, do not be so naive to try to influent and change the major review of the Western society. Even in today’s Internet age, the relative difference of the influence between general person and power owner is decreasing but still not enough for a real democracy.

Shangri-La without terrorism and slavery, we plege

Abstract: There are three basic points for the propaganda of anti-‘Free Tibet’ and there are also three paradoxes needs you guy to avoid.

The three basic points: First, Lamaism leaded by Dalai and his group is not a real religion, it is evil. There is no relation between the problem of Tibet and religion free. Dalai and his group are right the ones who against and demolish the religion free in Tibet. Dalai’s group is not qualified to deputize Tibet. Second, reveal the benefit foundation of Dalai and his group, and according this make an analysis to estimate the proportion of Tibetan who support independence firmly. For the most other Tibetans, as it is impossible to make referendum immediately to have a statistical result of their viewpoint, an analysis based on the principle of benefit can be made to give a reasonable estimation. At least, analyze the definition of Tibet people. According the Law of China and international convention, every Chinese who is a resident of Tibet will be consider as Tibet people. The concept of Dalai’s ‘Big Tibet’ and any other statement about ‘Only Tibetan is Tibet People’ are racism, and means segregation. It is not allowed in any place of this world.

Three paradoxes: First, do not make statements based on history. Unification and independence (at least autonomy) are both existed in history. It is confuse others and oneself. Moreover, many countries in today’s world are independent form settlements. Even a perfect statement based on history will not able to give the necessity of unification. Second, do not try to give necessity of unification based on the development of Tibet after 1950s and possible decay after independence. It is not an acceptable argumentation when reference to the concept of ‘Far East co-prosperity sphere’. At least, do not use the friendship between Tibetan of other Chinese nations to explain anything. This kind of friendship is also suitable between countries.

1, Dalai and his group are cheaters and liars. Their Lamaism is fake and evil.

One of the differences between science and religion is if there is any utterly authority, and one of the differences between a real religion and a fake one is that it uses an ideology system or an alive person as first authority. That is, if is there any God in the religion still alive and publicity. In any real religions all over the world, there is not alive utterly authority. That is, nobody is allowed to give oracle directly. Any believer is able to oppugn any master based on the creeds. Contemporary, any master or group must explain their mind according to the creed and then persuade their believer. Once an utterly authority who can give oracle directly appear, the religion will become fake and evil like the Middle Age or Dark Age in Europe.

The religion group of Tibet continuously makes alive God through reincarnation, and then use this Alive God to fool people. Dalai Lama is the Alive God.  I give him a joke that where he stand, where government is. From 1391, 13 Dalai Lamas were appointed. Today’s Dalai Lama is the 14^th Dalai Lama. Here is not to deny the existence of reincarnation, but we oppugn the veracity of finding the reincarnationist. The lamas themselves are not Gods, but how are they able to find the reincarnation of God and make no mistake in more 600 years? Why is the God’s reincarnation not appearing initiatively instead being found by persons who is not god? Why does the God’s reincarnation have no deity? The whole process is not open and has no disciplinarian. It is totally decided by a closed committee which consists of high-level lama.

All the things that Dalai Lama claimed to have, like the position of political leader and spirit leader, wealth, the palace, the power and believers is obtained through cheats and lies. Anyway, it does not mean that every religion is cheat. However, all the things belong to Dalia is obtained through cheats and lies. Moreover, it is absurdity to say that the believers trust him willing. Let’s come to this question: if a swindler cheat person on street should the police stop him? Do the police have rights to stop? Should the dirty money be confiscate and give back the person who has been cheated?

To continue their cheat and benefit, Dalai and his group are against the freedom of religion and the rights of education of Tibetan. According to the law of religion of China, every Chinese citizen have right to choose his own religion autonomy. However, Dalia and his group restricted the Tibetan’s freedom of religion through restrict the Tibetan’s right of education. The lamas are against the general education hold by the Chinese government for the recently 50 years. Their require the government annul the general education, stop every general elementary schools and high schools and let the temple education come back. Their purpose is to becloud the Tibetan, and they hope every Tibetan kids will either be an uneducated or go the temple learn from the lama and then becomes a lama. Moreover, even the chance of person to have a temple education is very limited, because contrasted to people who only take temple education the uneducated people are easy to be fooled and ruled. They also only allow very limited people to be able to be a lama, otherwise who fend them?

Therefore, Dalai and his group have no not qualified to deputize Tibet. Most of Chinese will not accept their delegacy.

2, Estimation the proportion of Tibetan who supports independence.

Before 1950s, serfs system runs in Tibet. According the some materials, under the system, less than 5% people –lamas and aristocrats— possess of everything in Tibet, including land, resource, populace and even human’s life and body. Lamas and aristocrats have absolute ownership of serfs’ life and any part of their bodies. The cruel facts like use skull and whole skin which taken off from alive human as sacrificial utensils and gifts can be proved by various materials.

As these 5% people, they have strong reason to support independence because they want their ‘Old good days’ come back. However, inside these 5%, Ban Chan—another Alive God like Dalai—and his group decide to support unification and be against to independence. Under the assumption that Ban Chan’s group and Dalai’s group have same size in history, plus the fact that Ban Chan’s group stay in Tibet while Dalai’s group is not during the recent 50 years, it can be estimate that Ban Chan’s group is a little bit large than Dalai’s. Therefore, the proportion of Tibetan who has strong reason and supports independence firmly is on less than 2%.

Let’s come to an analysis for other Tibetan. After the foundation of P.R.China, the serfs system in Tibet was abolished. Every Tibetan has entire franchise and human rights and is allowed to have personal property. The government spends tens of billions of dollars in Tibet every year to improve people’s life and build infrastructures like school, highroad, airport and etc. Besides this aid, billions of dollars is invested into Tibet by other Chinese people and groups. Moreover, trading with other parts of china and reception tourist from other parts of china supports the major economy in Tibet, changes and improves the Tibetan’s life. After independence, Tibet will lose all these benefit. Therefore, it is able to make a reasonable conclusion that most Tibetans do not support independence.

In fact, combine to the constitution of Tibet people, the firmly supporter of Tibet independence will be less on the base of 2%.

3, the definition of Tibet people

The P.R.China is founded in 1949, and then starts completely administration in Tibet. It is already 50 years. At present, in Tibet, 90% of the people are Tibetans and 10% are others. According to the related law of China, every Chinese citizen who resident in Tibet should be consider as Tibet people. That is every other Chinese citizen who resident in Tibet has the exactly same rights as Tibetans for the Tibet’s issue. Contemporarily, according to the laws and convention of dominion, any other Chinese citizens beside Tibet also have their right to give opinions on Tibet’s issue.

Any other statements about ‘Only Tibetan can decide Tibet’s issue’ are absurdity, are racism, obey the spirit of international pact and means segregation. It is not allowed in any place of this world. Let’s come to these questions: Does a Tibetan who has a citizen of other country have right to vote on Tibet’s issue? And, who are American?

Finally, based on the analysis above, if let Tibet people to vote on the Tibet’s independence, there will be only 1% people will support. Moreover, if ask all the Chinese citizens vote on Tibet’s independence, the proportion of supporters will be only 0.002%. Therefore, if without more evidences and facts, any body and any country have no reason to blame and protest China about Tibet’s issue.

Frequent Q & A:

1, Q: about the suppression of 3.14 issue in Tibet.

A: Dalai runs a terrorism group in Tibet. These terrorists made terrible things in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, China on 3.14.2008. The evidence show that the terrorists killed about 10 persons, hurt hundreds of person, burned several houses and stores and attacked more than a hundred stores and institutions.

They are criminals and they break the law. Therefore, the police have duty to arrest them. Some criminals resist arrest and attack the police, and then are arrested by force. That is the truth. The police of any other country will do the exactly same thing.

After that, about 40 persons have been arrested. Dalai claimed that the number is above 100. I do not know how he gets this number, but it doesn’t matter! The criminals killed about 10 persons, hurt hundreds of person, burned several houses and stores and attacked more than a hundred stores and institutions in only one day! So, either 40 or 100 will be a reasonable number. There is no suppression existed!

2, Q: The reason for these people use violence is just because they do not have a legitimate method to claim for independence.

A: It is not allowed for anyone to apply violence to populace in any situation! It is humanitarianism protected by international pact and also an argument of all the countries in this world.

Actually, there is indeed no legitimate method to claim for independence in China at present, but there is a legitimate way to require a modification of Law. If there are enough people who require independence, they will also have enough power to require a modification of the Law first.

In any situation and in any place all round the world, one person will not be allowed to break the law when his behavior forbid by the law.

3, Q:  Free speaking is human’s nature right, anyone can claim anything.

A: Free speaking is the right which provided and restrict by law, not a nature right. Is it allowed to support Osama bin Laden and claim that president Bush should make an interlocution with Osama bin Laden? And more, free speaking also does not mean free violence.

4, Q: The statement of the definition of Tibet people is colonists’ and pirate’ logic!

A: Anyway, it is not any kind of logic indeed. It is truth.

Authorization: Anyone is authorized to use the content of this article for and purpose with the author’s name and original link on that.